National Post

How a new law in B.C. turned thousands of live-in lovers into married couplesAcross B.C. on Monday morning, thousands of “roommates with benefits” and shacked-up lovers are awaking to find that, according to the provincial government, they were now basically married.Under the province’s Family Law Act, which comes into force on March 18, breakups between any couple that has shared the same roof for more than two years — or has had a child together — will now carry many of the trappings of divorce, including a 50/50 division of assets and debts.“For young couples who live together for a couple of years and then live with somebody else for a couple of years, it’s going to be interesting to see if they’re going to start making claims,” said Georgialee Lang, a Vancouver family lawyer and arbitrator. (Illustration by Chloe Cushman)

How a new law in B.C. turned thousands of live-in lovers into married couples
Across B.C. on Monday morning, thousands of “roommates with benefits” and shacked-up lovers are awaking to find that, according to the provincial government, they were now basically married.

Under the province’s Family Law Act, which comes into force on March 18, breakups between any couple that has shared the same roof for more than two years — or has had a child together — will now carry many of the trappings of divorce, including a 50/50 division of assets and debts.

“For young couples who live together for a couple of years and then live with somebody else for a couple of years, it’s going to be interesting to see if they’re going to start making claims,” said Georgialee Lang, a Vancouver family lawyer and arbitrator. (Illustration by Chloe Cushman)

  1. awesome-jessi reblogged this from nationalpost
  2. onlytopnews reblogged this from nationalpost
  3. evelark reblogged this from monsieurbombardier and added:
    I feel really ill-equipped to understand the scope of something like this. I don’t know what the law was like before...
  4. pleasekeeplearning reblogged this from howstuffworks
  5. retromantique reblogged this from inspirement and added:
    WTF
  6. kngwitheverything reblogged this from nationalpost
  7. monsieurbombardier reblogged this from howstuffworks
  8. gabosnoosnoo reblogged this from howstuffworks
  9. em946 reblogged this from howstuffworks
  10. randomness-appears reblogged this from howstuffworks
  11. redmagus77 reblogged this from inspirement
  12. allofthesparkles reblogged this from iwannajamitwithyou
  13. placitas reblogged this from howstuffworks
  14. notpatastic reblogged this from howstuffworks
  15. iwannajamitwithyou reblogged this from inspirement
  16. kingbarnett reblogged this from howstuffworks
  17. inspirement reblogged this from howstuffworks
  18. readerwriterthinker reblogged this from howstuffworks
  19. howstuffworks reblogged this from nationalpost
  20. longiee reblogged this from nationalpost
  21. onthemaps reblogged this from nationalpost and added:
    THIS BLOWS! All my plans for avoiding financial responsibility, out the window!
  22. itrytotalksensetomyself reblogged this from nationalpost
  23. dammit-hardison reblogged this from impalallama and added:
    New Zealand actually has something similar to this, the Propert Relationships Act, where de facto couples who have lived...
  24. toe-ster reblogged this from nationalpost
  25. theknightmurders reblogged this from freshest-tittymilk
  26. storybooklie reblogged this from familiaralien
  27. impalallama reblogged this from familiaralien
  28. imperialmog reblogged this from familiaralien and added:
    There has to be some sort of context about this, and why wasn’t this really known beforehand?
Blog comments powered by Disqus